The GitHub catalog, and what it is not
People who add “github” to the brand are usually looking for this index, not for a leaked copy of the directory. The repository is Carter54git/Ultimate-Catalog-Of-Web-Game-Ports. Its description line is “Greatest Games Web Ports.” Its homepage link points at rgc.zone.
| Badge | Number |
|---|---|
| Games | 956 |
| Playable demos | 533 |
| With source | 628 |
| Demo and source | 213 |
| Stars / forks on the public repo | 663 / 57 |
| Repository created | 2025-02-01 |
How it differs from the directory
ported2browser.com showed 305 ports on 4 Nov 2026 and attaches input icons and length notes to cards. The GitHub list is larger because it includes projects that are source-only. Its README says many ports need your own game files. It does not review safety. Cricket 07 in that list points at cricket07.dhaiwat.com and Dhaiwat10/cricket07-browser. Skate 3 points at skate.aaddpp.lol. The Simpsons Hit & Run row mentions four builds. NFS Most Wanted mentions nfsmwonline.com and web.nfsmwo.com. I repeat those as index entries. The play notes live on each game guide.
There is no license file on the public repository. If you cite a number, cite the README date. A star count moves; 663 is the reading from this check, not a trophy that stays still.
Questions people ask
Is this repository the Ported2Browser source code?
No. The repository is an independent index called the Ultimate Catalog of Web Game Ports. The directory at ported2browser.com is a different website.
Can I play all 956?
The README’s own badges say 533 have a playable demo and 213 have both a demo and source. The rest are listed without that promise.
What license covers the list?
The public repository showed no license. Quote it with a link, and do not assume you can copy the whole list into another product.
Sources
- Ultimate Catalog repository — checked 2026-11-04
- README raw file — checked 2026-11-04